RE 50 STATE LABORATORIES TAILS WAGGING BIG MNC OTHER STATES OFFSHORE OR FOREIGN DOGS

Many corporations were originally incorporated in New Jersey, a small state, which I had suggested recently (re NYT editorial) should perhaps be rolled into New York, along with a few others, for good measure. Thinking about Newt's view, why have '50 labs', when say 20, or 10, or even say 5, would do even better, economies of scale, consolidations, outsourcing, and all of that?

New Jersey was a big one for incorporation costs 'breaks'; so many big big MNC dogs have their tails wagging in, guess where, New Jersey.

Most of those corporations do no one in New Jersey very much good anymore anyway, to say the least; they might help New York a little here or there; in fact, a lot of damage and neglect there in NJ, probably.

Therefore, why not, when we roll New Jersey into a 'bigger state dog', simply unincorporate all these unpatriotic MNC behemoths in the 'New Jersey Pound', in the rolling process?

Why really bother with trying to resuscitate 'antitrust' laws, from the New Deal period and before, a dead letter now anyway:

just unincorporate them as part of consolidation, and commence the 'winding down' process.

If you want smaller weaker government, you need even smaller even weaker still private entities, otherwise, WHO GOVERNS? Many MNCs have 'economies' and 'capitalizations', and therefore political power, larger than that of some states, and most foreign countries.

I know this will sound odd, but Newt's position is equally at an extreme location.