is: how do you tell military planners not to plan, or that no central planning is best,
even though you tell economists, who have to oversee an economy at the very least, that somehow no planning is best?
Better still, if no military policy can succeed without central planning (and I take it as axiomatic that this is true), how could an economic policy do so without it?
Especially where, as Rickards himself readily admits, as a supposed insight of his, that they, economic financial and military dimensions have become ever more intertwined?
No comments:
Post a Comment