RE DK's site

Zosima's comment, a very nice capsule summary:

"Even though I majored in history and politics, it took me decades to realize the true nature of the US system. Alfred Stepan says on NPR (6-28-13) that the US has the most difficult to change constitution of any democracy on the planet. Justice Ginsburg says she would not recommend our constitution as a model, and countries that have recently adopted new constitutions have all agreed with her. It’s many essentially undemocratic features reinforce the status quo, thwart change, and fragment responsibility so that no one can be held responsible. America stagnates for decades on end until the greed of the plutocracy results in some kind of crisis that causes a super majority of people to temporarily gain power and implement some reforms, like the New Deal. But the required super majority cannot be maintained for long and the reforms are whittled away over time until the next crisis. It is quite ominous and depressing to realize that America is stuck in this endless cycle of stagnation and crisis, but we are. Thanks to our constitution, the small moneyed segment of the population that benefits from the cycle need only convince 20-30% of the population to go along with them and they can thwart change indefinitely. Read some of the many critics of our constitution, I recommend Daniel Lazare’s, The Frozen Republic."

I would just point out that some manner of Plutocracy was functioning even during the New Deal.

The important point is that events, processes, and agendas, move in important directions, around and within the country, even while the American political system, and its international political system institutional progeny, themselves, churn frostingly on.  

Term search: Nevins, drift.